Relancy routing doctrine
When you specify who this report should be directed to, you are setting the intended destination.
Relancy treats that as signal, not an automatic command.
- We may forward your report to the organization or authority you identify.
- We may route it to a more appropriate recipient if your choice is clearly misaligned.
- We may decline to forward reports that are abusive, clearly malicious, or unsafe to transmit.
Discipline: You own the story and the intent; Relancy owns the routing discipline needed to keep
the channel credible and defensible.
You are not required to identify yourself. However, details in your narrative may still allow others to infer who
you are, especially in small teams or unique roles.
- Leave the contact field blank to keep this channel one-way and anonymous.
- Include only names and identifiers that are necessary to understand the risk.
- If a detail feels identifying and non-essential, consider omitting or generalizing it.
This channel exists to surface operational, ethical, and safety risk—not to settle personal scores. Relancy treats
good-faith reports as signal for investigation, not as verdicts.
- Describe what you observed or reasonably know, and flag what is second-hand.
- Call out uncertainty explicitly (“I am not sure,” “I did not see this directly”).
- Use this channel when internal paths feel unsafe, blocked, or conflicted.
Operator: Relancy – incident intake, routing, and audit trail.
Purpose: Provide a disciplined, neutral path to get the right facts in front of the right people.
Limitations: Not an emergency service, legal advisor, or replacement for required internal reporting where law or policy demands it.